Monday, August 24, 2020

Not a Review Necessarily: The Haunting of Everything and Everyone, Everywhere (and some horror history)

For anyone whose ever wondered how someone can be a "horror movie fan," John Carpenter, director of some great movies in the genre such as In The Mouth of Madness, The Thing, The Fog and especially Halloween, summed up a wonderful answer.

"Everyone's afraid of something and we're all afraid of something together. It binds us as people," he said. 

While I was attending the horror movie convention, Crypticon, in St. Joseph, Mo., back in 2018, I asked the head of the Kansas City Horror Club the same question. His response was that horror movies act as a "how-to" guide as we face our fears. 
I can buy that. Maybe we won't ever be chased down by a machete wielding, hockey mask wearing killer. But in the off chance we ever are, and we've seen the Friday the 13th movies, we'll know what to do and what not to do. 

It's true that through the decades, horror movies generally reflect the fears and anxieties of society. This is why I find it curious that paranormal content is very popular now-a-days in horror films and TV. 

The social climate of the times also plays a role in a movie's storyline, and the its significance within the corridors of film titles. It's easily overlooked with general audiences. After all, people are people, and Friday and Saturday nights are a time to turn the lights low and give the mind a break. 

But what's with all the ghosts? In movies, there's a long list of movies surrounding haunted people and haunted places - An American Haunting (2006), Paranormal Activity (2007), A Haunting in Connecticut (2009), The Haunting of Molly Hartley (2008), A Haunting in Georgia (2002), The Haunting of Hill House (2018), The Haunting of Whaley House (2012), The Haunting of Fox Hollow Farm (2011), The Haunting of Ellie Rose (2015), The Conjuring (2013), The Haunting of Sharon Tate (2019), The Haunting of Borley Rectory (2019), The Haunting of La Llorona (2019). 

On the Travel Channel alone, there's an even longer list of reality ghost shows (that is, paranormal investigators) along with documentary programs showcasing "real ghostly encounters" - Ghost Adventures, Ghost Asylum, Ghost Nation, Ghost Stories, Ghosts of Morgan City, Ghost Bait, Ghost Brothers, Paranormal 911, Paranormal Caught on Camera, Paranormal Survivor, Paranormal Emergency, Scariest Night of My Life, My Ghost Story, Most Haunted, Most Terrifying Places, My Haunted House, My Paranormal Nightmare, Haunted Hospitals, Haunted Case Files, Haunted Live, Haunted Things, Haunted Towns, Haunted USA, Haunting in the Heartland, Hotel Paranormal, and my personal favorite Fear the Woods

Again, this is just on the Travel Channel. With a list like this, who or what isn't haunted these days?  

I've been intrigued about this ghost trend in horror for several years as, like I said, horror generally reflects the fears and anxiety's of their respective time. 

During the tumultuous era of World War I, and the aftermath felt in Germany in the 1920s, what's referred to as Weimar expressionism - a new way of looking at the world - grew popular and landed heavily into German horror films. 

With meager budgets compared to that of Hollywood, German film makers looked to more simplistic ways to convey emotion, distinct and surreal atmospheres, and uniquely haunting stories in their movies. No lavish costumes, or towering sets, or mind blowing special effects. 
Gothic horror quickly sprung from this new portrayal of reality, looking into darker, sinister characteristics of human behavior and the human mind. 
From this concept, films such as The Cabinet of Dr. Caligari (1920), Nosferatu (1922), Phantom (1922), and The Last Laugh (1922) were produced and continue influencing modern horror movie makers today. 

The styles of movies like these use a lot of light and dark contrast, embrace surreal imagery, and show a great deal of eye shots - close-ups of a character's eyes to arouse fear and suspense in an audience who'll feel what a character is feeling simply by the terror or evil seen through their eyes. 
This is the foundation of horror movies.

As Americans were working to return to normalcy after the first World War, and enjoying the roaring 1920s, they were met with the stock market crash and a great depression. Meanwhile, the world was also facing another world war. The good times of the roaring 1920s roared themselves out, and America found itself  facing a dark era the likes of which hadn't been seen since the Civil War. 

This was also the period of Universal's monster movies. Now considered iconic, these monsters matched our looming fears in that they were out of our control - Dracula, Frankenstein's monster, the Mummy, the Creature from the Black Lagoon, the Wolfman, and my personal favorite, the Invisible Man. They're either monstrosities of man's own creation, like Frankenstein's monster. Or they're creatures of darkness whose origins are foreign to us, who will get us when we least expect it, such as Count Dracula. How do we stop them? 

Americans felt vulnerable just like their victims on screen. These Universal monsters preyed on that vulnerability. But we managed to find a way to defeat them and haven't forgotten how to since.
Monsters like these were the audience's face-off with their own sense of powerlessness. We couldn't get enough of them. Sequels upon sequels were made, with monsters facing off with other monsters on screen. Revenge of the Creature from the Black Lagoon (1955), Frankenstein Meets The Wolfman (1943), The Mummy's Tomb (1942), The Invisible Man's Revenge (1944), Dracula's Daughter (1936), and House of Frankenstein (1944) to name a few titles. 
And when America dropped an atomic bomb on Japan, the "king of the monsters" arouse from the fallout, and brought the atomic age into horror. Godzilla! 

This was the nuclear age in horror/ SciFi. Giant creatures, often radioactive, began devouring our cities on screen. This was also the time when America started looking to space exploration, the final frontier. Who knew what was out there? Aliens from outer space, most of them unfriendly, began to visit us in the movies. It became a mix of radioactive creatures and aliens from space.

These fears and uncertainties - the unknown of space and the fear of nuclear threats thanks in part to the Cuban missal crisis -  nagged at us through the 1950s and 60s. While that was going on, a counter culture was developing in America which changed horror for the 1970s. 

People began noticing how ugly some of our fellow Americans are via racism, and bigotry. Revolutions against traditions and family, and new ways of life were popping up. 
Movies like Night of the Living Dead (1968) brought the zombie genre to the forefront. Old versus new. The dead walk among the living.

Vera Farmiga and Patrick Wilson as
famed ghost hunters Ed and Lorraine Warren in
The Conjuring, released in 2013.
The movie Dawn of the Dead (1978) has an underlying tone of American consumerism. And that counter culture shifting the American family is evident in the movie The Texas Chainsaw Massacre (1974). 

Good versus evil. Godliness, faith and religion versus materialism and atheism became much more real in society. Many saw it as a threat to the American way of life. 
The perfect family, and Americana in general, common in 1950s media, wasn't as prominent now. It was challenged. The time was ripe for unholy films like Rosemary's Baby (1968), The Omen (1976) and The Exorcist (1973) to emerge. Religion was at a cusp not seen in the lifetime of anyone living in this decade. Satan versus God was a serious thought on the forefront of many discussions, especially when major changes in the Catholic Church were being established. I'll include the well done, yet underrated 1976 movie Alice, Sweet Alice here. It's a movie that certainly reflects the religious social climate of the time.

It was also in the late 1950s through the 1970s that Universal monsters began to reemerge thanks to the U.K's Hammer Film Production's remakes - The Mummy, The Brides of Dracula, The Curse of the Werewolf, Dracula: Prince of Darkness, Frankenstein Must Be Destroyed. Classic Hammer Horror films still have a following.

Through the sixties and seventies, free love and the so-call "sexual revolution" blew up. By the dawn of the 1980s, more people looked on it with disdain. A war on drugs ensued - the same drugs young people indulged in, in the seventies. The decade - the Reagan years - more or less ushered in a conservative confidence in the political system (and society in general) severely tarnished by drugs, "sexual liberation" and the Nixon era.

The sins of not-so-innocent baby boomer parents needed to be punished. And their children inherited their sins. So horror movies like A Nightmare on Elm Street (1984), Friday the 13th (1980), and Halloween (1978) depicted teenagers often freely indulging in premarital sex come face to face with unstoppable serial killers with an other-worldly nature. And Freddy Krueger killed the children of Elm Street in their dreams to get back at their parents.

It was blood, guts, and gore. It's thanks to John Carpenter's Halloween movie that the term "slasher" became part of horror lingo. 

Horror in the 90s saw some revisions of past classics, along with some new fears with a more psychological feel to them for audiences to contend with such as Silence of the Lambs (1991). Jacob's Ladder (1990) is a look back at the post-traumatic horror of the Vietnam War. And the movie Misery (1990), based on Stephen King's novel, depicts deranged fandom. 

America had pulled itself through a lot of darkness with horror movies to help them face their fears. The long awaited period of normalcy, as best as could be expected, came about in the 1990s. Sure we still tackled drugs, and crime needed to be cleaned up in a lot of places. Horror revitalized a lot of the old classic tropes. 

And once the 90's were over, and a new millennium was upon us, America was thrown back into darkness and despair on Sept. 11, 2001. We found ourselves face to face with a new enemy - a serious, seemingly crafty, dangerous, and unsympathetic one. Foreign terrorists.
If these terrorists could take down two monumental buildings with two airplanes, strike the Pentagon, and attempt to crash another plane into, maybe, the White House or the Capital Building right under our noses, what else could they do? 

The thought of a virus attack loomed over the nation, and we saw movies like 28 Days Later (2002), and Quarantine (2008) came to be. 

Americans feared that evil was hidden in places we'd never expect to find it. No one was safe. This panic was mirrored in movies such as Wrong Turn (2003), The Devil's Rejects (2005). Turistas (2006), and Hostel (2007).

Now, we come to today.
Aside from all the paranormal content out there, the current trend includea what I dub "family horror" - It Follows (2014), Hereditary (2018), Us (2019), A Quiet Place (2018), and The Babadook (2014)Watching these movies, they clearly depict a break down in the once tight bonds of the American family. 

Families aren't portrayed as strong or close knit in most modern horror movies. Maybe it's because we spend so much time as a society online. Parents are distant. Children are disinterested. We have a lot of ways to talk to each other today, but we really don't have anything say. 
Get Out (2017) and The Witch (2015) specifically convey this scenario. The former deals more with the aspect of white society attempting to form black individuals into what they deem as socially normal. 
Aside from that, modern horror/ thriller is saturated with paranormal films. 

I don't think you can discuss the existence of spirits without going into religion because religious institutions are the front runners in any discussion of an afterlife. So, pardon me if I sound preachy.
It's no revelation that our modern society is a skeptical one, to say the least, when it comes to religion in general, the existence of the human soul, and where a soul goes when it leaves the body. If space is the great unknown, life after death is much more so. 
A scene from 1999's The Sixth Sense depicts spirits appearing as they died.

I personally think the success of 1999's The Sixth Sense has something to do with the current trend in paranormal entertainment. And The Exorcism of Emily Rose (2005) resurrected the exorcism trend also prevalent in today's horror. The two subgenres (hauntings and exorcisms) go hand in hand. Still, there's something deeper.

There's an extensive amount of animosity when it comes to religion these days. There's also a lot of doubt. I mean, there has always been animosity and doubt. But today, it's written into many laws and spoken of like it's an animosity understood by all.

Matthew 16:4 says a "wicked and adulterous generation seeketh a sign." 
A sign is what all these self-proclaimed "paranormal research experts" ask for on TV. To be fair, who doesn't want to know the absolute truth about whether ghosts exist or not? And if somehow their existence was suddenly confirmed without a shadow of a doubt, there'd be so many more questions. 
Society is largely skeptical, or unbelieving, when it comes to the spiritual. Still, there's something underneath the surface that's plaguing a lot of consciences. What if the soul does exist? What if there is a heaven and a hell? What if there is an eternity? What if? 

In our society, where science is deemed unquestionable, paranormal investigators on television attempt to present supposed scientific proof of ghosts using a ton of gadgetry. Meanwhile, other TV programs offer alleged personal encounters. What makes these ghost hunters "experts" is beyond me considering nothing is more mysterious than what happens after we die. It's a concept science cannot answer because science doesn't deal in the spiritual. Regardless, many of these ghost hunters on TV will tell you otherwise as they show off their ghost finding gadgets and recorders. Who decided they're experts is unclear. My guess is these TV ghost hosts declared themselves as such. They offer resolutions and answers as fact though it's all based on their own speculations and opinions. And it seems like every 

Spirits are as old as time. Ghost stories, especially those handed down from generation to generation, demand at least some reverence. They come from the aisles of history - our family history, our society's history, our country's history. 

Places we revere are often said to be inhabited by ghosts. And many spirits we've heard about are often people we honor and respect whether we knew them or not. Or, they were people who deserve our sympathy - the bride who died on her wedding day, the child who lost his mother for all eternity, the soldier who never made it home. 

Their memory can turn into tales, and then into legend. They can be accounts of President Lincoln haunting his old bedroom in the White House, inmates still wandering the cells of Alcatraz Island, or the ghost of a faceless woman that a friend of mine said haunted his old house somewhere in the hills of Oakland, California. It's all intriguing whether we believe it or not. When it comes to ghosts, as John Carpenter said, we're afraid together. Whether we believe in them and in an afterlife or not, this trend in today's horror movies leaves us facing the question, "what if?" 

Saturday, August 15, 2020

67) Haunting of the Morgan Estate (2020)

Brendan Rudnicki

Cast
Michael Babcock - Ethan Morgan
Nancy Barber - Nancy
Blake Burdette - Jake
Brian Ramian - Eli

After finishing my last post about Tom Pix and Rob Zombie, I nearly forgot I had a film to review. That should be an indicator of my thoughts to come about 2020's Haunting of the Morgan Estate.
I found this movie while saving movies in my Amazon Prime movie que. The poster and short synopsis intrigued me enough to watch it.
Everything about this movie is wrong starting with the poster. 
It depicts a looming dilapidated plantation style home with a dark turquoise backdrop. It's the ideal setting for an old fashioned ghost story. It's classic and appealing.
Nope! That's not what I was treated to. 
Instead, I got a modern cookie-cutter estate that looks like any other contemporary home in any recently developed gated community. 
Next, the title begins with the word "haunting." It goes without saying "haunting" implies ghosts are at play here. 
While there is technically some kind of supernatural presence in the movie, it's really an afterthought.  
Ethan Morgan (Michael Babcock) is running for a public office. In the middle of his campaign, he and his campaign manager/ secret girlfriend, Karen (Nancy Barber) head to his private estate to escape while she continues to work on his campaign.
As they spend time at the estate, they're accompanied by the estate's caretaker, Jake (Blake Burdette), who's an old family friend of Ethan's. Jake maintains a loyalty to Ethan and his family. He also doesn't seem to care much for Karen based on his demeanor and attitude. 
Ethan often has to leave Karen alone while he tends to his problematic brother, whom he claims has relapsed into a drug problem. 
Meanwhile, Karen takes it upon herself to snoop through Ethan's belongings. During her searches, she finds an antique camera and a dark room. So, she begins using the camera around the estate, and developing her own pictures. 
Through very thin paranormal goings-on, she soon starts finding out Ethan's former wife may have met a serious fate. And Karen had better take heed. 
The movie is painfully predictable. I feel that comment deserves a "duuhh" as a response.  
The acting is poor...so very poor. In the final scene, when Jake starts to stand up to Ethan as he knows the truth about his former wife, the entire scenario plays out like someone is off camera holding up cue cards so Burdette can just get through the scene. 
But there's one thing that's missing in this hour-long mess. It's a crucial element, too. A haunting! There is none. I mean, there's a ghost briefly here and there, but it's as though the writers threw some paranormal elements in there as an afterthought. I wouldn't be surprised if after the final shoot, someone remembered, "oh, yeah. It's 'the haunting of' the Morgan Estate. We forgot the damn haunts." 
The whole experience was like sitting through a high school film project. However, With a high school film project, the audience would applaud for at least the effort put into the production.
There's supposedly a curse and an old house in this movie. Well, there is no "old" house as seen on the poster image. And the audience really has to put the pieces together to come to the conclusion, "maybe there's a curse. That would kind of make sense." 
The thing is there's really no scary catastrophe that a curse would bring about in this movie. Normally when a curse leads to misfortune, it's clear an antagonist fell into that serious misfortune because of a curse mentioned earlier in the movie. It's normally a peril that only a curse could bring about. There is some misfortune that befalls Ethan, but it's through his own misdeeds. Actions have consequences. Only a superstitious individual would conclude in this particular circumstance that his misfortune was from a curse in the common understanding of the word. Everyone else might call it karma, or "the dude really f'd up." 
When it comes to obscure movies, Haunting of the Morgan Estate really takes the taco. I couldn't even find stills from the movie to include here. Nor could I find a plot summery to help me fill in some holes. Hell, I couldn't even find a trailer to link to up above. Nothing! All I could find is a blurb on imdb.com. 
Incidentally, rather than include a link to a trailer or scene, I included a link to a video called "the worst death scene." It has absolutely nothing to do with Haunting of the Morgan Estate. But trust me. You'll get more amusement regardless.
Movies about hauntings are the trend these days, which I find interesting as horror reflects the societal fears and unrest of their respective era.
Horror is a mirror of what's scaring a society. So, why are there so many ghost movies and TV programs nowadays? 
There's a barrage of movie and T.V. titles that begin with "haunting of..." And just turn on the Travel Channel. The number of paranormal investigation shows, and series on paranormal encounters and eyewitnesses is overwhelming. 
A Haunting in Connecticut (2009), A Haunting in Georgia (2002), A Haunting in Salem (2011), The Haunting of Sharon Tate (2019), The Haunting of Molly Hartley (2008), The Haunting of Borley Rectory (2019), The Haunting of La Llorona (2019), The Haunting of Hill House (2019), The Haunting of Whaley House (2012), The Haunting of Fox Hollow Farm (2011), The Haunting of Ellie Rose (2015). Everyone and everything, everywhere is haunted! I'll explore this trend in my next post. 
Movies about haunted houses, and ghosts, are as old as horror itself. 
Quite often, ghost stories contain a certain wisdom passed down through generations. That's what keeps some ghosts alive. Because of this most ghost stories demand a certain respect, even if just because our grandparent's gave them to us. It's on par with honoring our dead loved ones. 
But this flick just doesn't care. It doesn't even try to care. 
Nothing about the 68 minutes that is Haunting of the Morgan Estate is interesting, nor satisfying - not even for a ghost story. And for a ghost story, it's not even accidentally intriguing
It's painfully bland and has the nerve to call itself a "ghost story." Maybe it's better I couldn't find any production stills for this mess. There are other obscure, even campy horror movies that still deserve some attention. Those, at least, have a fun element to them most of the time. Haunting of the Morgan Estate doesn't even fall into that category. So, let me be the first to officially put a curse on this nonsense. I mean, someone needs to make it scary...somehow.  

Wednesday, August 5, 2020

Not a Review Necessarily: Did Tom Six and Rob Zombie Take Horror Too Far?

Sheri Moon Zombie, Sid Haig, and Bill Moseley.
The Human Centipede and The Devil's Rejects are both movies that found me needing to pause in order to regain myself while watching them. 
These two are the most jarring movies I've ever seen. 
I didn't know what sort of movie I was getting into when I rented the 2009 Dutch horror film The Human Centipede, directed by Tom Six, some time ago. 
I finished it convinced there can be a fate worse than dropping dead.
Before I saw Rob Zombie's 2005 sequel The Devil's Rejects, I watched James Rolfe's Cinemassacre review on it so I knew what I was getting into. It didn't make it any less disturbing, though.
It's the second movie in a trilogy. The preceding film House of 1,000 Corpses and the most recent and final film of this series, 3 From Hell, though disturbing and scary in their own way, don't quite cross the line as much as Rejects. At least not in the same way.
All three movies follow the twisted, sadistic, backwoods Firefly family.  
The first is its own, demented, dark ride. It's a revolting Halloween house-of-horror style movie. Blood, guts, gore, and grotesqueries are what pass for scary these days. But it does go a little above and beyond that. 
3 From Hell is more focused on its story line since audiences were already introduced to the family, especially in the second movie. It's really a follow-up movie to show them in prison, escaping prison, and fleeing to Mexico, and all the "misdeeds" they're up to along the way.
I can tell there's some influence taken from the classic The Texas Chainsaw Massacre as far as the Firefly family goes. And all that is in House of 1,000 Corpses. It's shocking in that Rob Zombie pure hell style of horror. 
I definitely would not recommend this movie because of its realistic violent nature that begins even before the credits are done, and gains intensity until the end.
I have to admire the way it does what it sets out to do - shock and scare. It's certainly not a fun scare, though. 
While the characters are all terrifying and played well - Sid Haig as Captain Spaulding, Sherri Moon Zombie as Baby, and Bill Moseley as Otis Driftwood - it's Moseley who terrifies me the most. 
He has a presence on screen that's more terrifying and intimidating than Linda Blair possessed by the devil himself.
Watching interviews with Moseley, and even following him on Twitter, he seems like a person who loves his fans, is down-to-earth, and just an all-around nice guy. In an interview - I think on Adam Green's Scary Sleepover on YouTube - Moseley mentioned he's generally not into horror movies. That's kind of funny because he's appeared in quite a few such as Army of Darkness, The Texas Chainsaw Massacre II, and the 1990 remake of Night of the Living Dead.   
But his portrayal of Otis is absolutely beyond chilling and, again, intimidating. His character's coldness and hardness is evident in just the way he talks. He is soullessness personified.
No doubt there are people in the world as cruel and soulless as Otis is in the movie, and heaven help us if we ever stumble upon those individuals. But in the end, they are just people...only the kind you don't want to run into anywhere. And that's how Moseley portrays him. Just a cold man who's callous, unsympathetic, and vengeful towards all of society for no clear reason. 
With Moseley, the acting is not only in his voice and appearance, it's in his eyes and demeanor. It seems natural on screen. To make a character as cruel as Otis Driftwood - a character who easily makes audiences feel fear just by watching him - shows a truly talented actor. 
In the first act of the movie, Baby pretends to be passed out in the middle of a road as a good Samaritan lady in a waitress uniform pulls over to help her. As the driver gets out to see if Baby is alright, Otis sneaks up behind her, kills her, and steals her car. Right away, we want to see him pay for his crime. We want him to pay for making us fear him.
They drive to a run-down motel to hide out for while, and call Baby's dad, Captain Spaulding (Sid Haig), who poses as a clown, to meet them there. 
Meanwhile Otis and Baby hold a travelling family hostage at gunpoint in their motel room. They humiliate them in the worst possible ways.  
Otis takes one of the family's companions and one of the family members out to a secluded area. He ultimately kills them after he tells the companion, "I am the devil. And I've come to do the devil's work." 
When Otis returns to the motel, he brings back the severed face of the family member and continues to torment the family. They carry on in such a sadistic and evil way. It's one of the most horrific scenes I've ever watched. I felt guilty that I even allowed myself to sit through it. 
There's two ways to look at a movie like this. It's either a horror movie in the most truest sense of the word, challenging you to get through it (I had to pause it a couple times because I felt yucky watching it. That's the best word I can use. "Yucky"). Or, you can watch this for the sake its meant to be watched. It's not a good time, despite some humor in the story. But the way Rob Zombie and the actors, especially Moseley, mold the horror genre into something that's so honest and maybe even masterful to the genre's namesake is impressive. It's horror! The Devil's Rejects is brutal and honest. It's portrayals are awful because such violent acts in reality are awful. 
The movie has been criticized by some who believe it wants the audience to cheer for the Firefly family. I don't see it that way, but I can understand that point of view. It's like audiences taking a liking to Dr. Hannibal "the Cannibal" Lecter in Silence of the Lambs and the sequel, Hannibal. I chalk up that affinity to Anthony Hopkins' talent as an actor to make a sadistic cannibal murderer into an otherwise likable person regardless of his sick nature. 
A movie can make a catastrophic auto collision look fantastic. In reality, the same auto collision would be cringe worthy, terrible and absolutely devastating to someone only hearing about it. That's The Devil's Rejects. 
T
he Human Centipede has become well known in pop culture regardless of who has or hasn't seen it. Even South Park had an entire satirical episode based on the movie. The reputation of The Human Centipede definitely precedes it. 
I'll get the gory details out of the way. 
It centers around Dr. Heiter (Dieter Laser), a true mad scientist, who kidnaps three tourists and...*this detail is really disgusting* sews them together mouth to anus. The digestive track is surgically connected so food is passed from the first victim until it passes through the last victim. I know. It's a storyline that's more than disgusting.
I reluctantly have to give this film credit in that it went beyond the standard norms of SciFi horror films which take grisly scenarios and water them down as far as content goes. Teens are generally the target audience so there has to be a line drawn somewhere, even among slasher flicks. Movie makers can depict a head being severed, or a naked woman being sawed in half, but some lines still can't be crossed. I don't know what those lines are exactly. And quite possibly, neither do movie makers.
The entire purpose behind The Human Centipede seems only to cross lines - to elevate the horror genre to something even more unspeakable than before.  
There are some film enthusiasts who might appreciate that. Most other people, even fans of slasher flicks may find a movie like The Human Centipede challenging to watch. With the most unfortunate trend of internet shock videos, and the challenge people set on others to watch them (I won't bother naming a single one), a movie like Human Centipede certainly follows that dark, sick fad.       
It certainly takes horror to somewhere grotesque that horror formerly went only in underground films and comic books, and now viral shock videos. Somehow, it still maintains that fictional element. It's hard to watch, and leaves you wondering "could that really happen?" But horror can only continue to shock audiences more and more. 
In a 2019 interview with bloody-disgusting.com, which called the movie a "game changer in the world of body horror" Tom Six said, "I am all about creating original work and pushing boundaries of art/film. I hate mediocre shit. It's great to have raised the bar but not just to shock for the shock. I'm the guy that travels the seven seas while others stay safely on shore." 
Six directed the following two sequels to The Human Centipede as well. And he connected each film. Where the first movie ends, the second movie begins. And where the second movie ends, the third movie begins. It's kind of like a movie-centipede. Clever! 
But (no pun intended) I see this movie as an experiment. It's not meant to entertain and frighten like a slasher or alien movie. 
It uses realism, simplicity, and of course shock to pull this off. Audiences still squirm at the sight of, say, Art the Clown sawing through someone's neck and then pulling off their head. They'll rub their own neck and try to look away as all the stage blood gushes out of that hole where a head used to be. But surgically attaching someone to another person, anus to mouth - nope! This movie pushed the envelope for sure, and helped bring the genre (what a movie can or can't do) to someplace new. 
As critic Roger Ebert asks, is The Human Centipede true to the genre?
"[It] scores high on the scale," he said in his review. 
Sid Haig as Captain Spaulding in The Devil's Rejects.
Meanwhile, The Devil's Rejects is sadly like a conglomeration of news articles we read in papers more often then should be reported. Where news platforms leave out a lot of gory details, Rob Zombie keeps them in.  
His wife, Sheri, once said Rob doesn't cater to teens when it comes to horror. His movie is very confident in itself. And what separates it from House of 1,000 Corpses is that the audience gets an in-depth look at the characters in the second film, and how lost they are. Still, it's not a pleasant ride along, nor is it meant to be, thanks for the talented actors. 
The point isn't to tell a good story or make a good movie. If it's a bad movie, it doesn't matter. Horror always tries to outdo itself. Once, the shower became a terrifying place to go thanks to Alfred Hitchock's Pyscho. Now, there's just about no place safe to go. Horror producers still manege to find places audiences haven't been to and been scared at the same time. Otherwise, we have to go to familiar scenarios, like abduction, and see what horrific possibilities may come about. Horror, afterall, is a "how-to" guide in facing our fears.